Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chloe Paquet vs Jessie Aney Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paquet vs Aney analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Chloe Paquet vs Jessie Aney Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Paquet 2 - 0 Aney
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paquet has won 45.31% of points on their second serve, while Aney has won 42.69%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paquet, in recent form, has won 54.72% of their opponent's second serve points, while Aney has won 57.46%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.51% and 43.35% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paquet has saved 54.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Aney has saved 53.88% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paquet has won 52.63% of matches played (W/L 40/ 36), with Aney winning 47.46% (W/L 28/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paquet has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 227/ 198), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9). Aney has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 17/ 8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 54/ 49).
- Player level: In the last year, Paquet has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.7% of matches (W/L 29/ 25), where as Aney has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.48% of matches (W/L 20/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Paquet winning 2 times and Aney being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Paquet winning 4 and Aney winning 1. The last match between Paquet and Aney was at the Livesport Prague Open - Prague, 29-07-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Chloe Paquet getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:20:38.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paquet and Aney have played a deciding set 1 times, with Paquet winning 1 times and Aney 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Paquet winning 1, and Aney 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paquet has played against opponents with an average rank of 267.46 while Aney has played against players with an average rank of 220.64.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paquet has won 37% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Aney has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paquet has converted 40.82% of breakpoint opportunities, and Aney has converted 48.21% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
115
Rank
101
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
449
Rank
343
High
26
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
52% (398-371)
Career Total W/L
60% (217-142)
50% (19-19)
YTD W/L
50% (14-14)
$383,185
Career Prize Money
$2,360
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Chloe Paquet vs Jessie Aney For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Paquet VS Aney
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Chloe Paquet | Jessie Aney |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 30 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 3 |
| DFs Total | 8 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:20:38 | 2:20:38 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (109/183) | 60% (111/186) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (67/109) | 57% (63/111) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (39/74) | 37% (28/75) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (12/30) | 25% (7/28) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (95/186) | 42% (77/183) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-2 |
Stats 
Chloe Paquet
Player
Jessie Aney
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
43%
(
35 of
82)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
47 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| 6-3 5-7 6-1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Jessie Aney
58%
(
63 of
108)
1st Serve %
73%
(
76 of
104)
7
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
43 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
104)
113
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chloe Paquet | Jessie Aney |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (19/19) | 50% (14/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (46/45) | 54% (36/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (422/412) | 54% (323/278) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 33% (2/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (13/10) | 33% (4/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (8/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0.36 |
| Aces Total | 123 | 105 |
| DFs per game | 0.44 | 0.47 |
| DFs Total | 178 | 137 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:4 | 1:41:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 264.63 | 201.93 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1571/2743) | 59% (1149/1936) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (991/1571) | 65% (743/1149) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (531/1172) | 43% (336/787) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (160/392) | 48% (135/280) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (1332/2920) | 48% (976/2029) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (13/12) | 35% (6/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (8/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (19/38) | 50% (14/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 20% (1/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 47% (7/15) | 27% (3/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 70% (20/14) | 75% (16/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 30% (20/6) | 25% (16/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 28% (18/5) | 17% (12/2) |
Chloe Paquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Marina Stakusic
Player
Chloe Paquet
58%
(
54 of
93)
1st Serve %
51%
(
49 of
97)
7
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
10
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Solana Sierra
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
75 of
114)
7
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
50 of
75)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
45 of
114)
109
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Chloe Paquet
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
52%
(
44 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
48 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Hannah Klugman
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
82)
8
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Irina Maria Bara
Player
Chloe Paquet
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
82)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
44 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
88
|
0-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Marketa Vondrousova
Player
Chloe Paquet
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Katerina Siniakova
51%
(
63 of
124)
1st Serve %
68%
(
78 of
114)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
44 of
78)
48%
(
29 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
45%
(
56 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
119
Total Points Won
119
|
3-6 7-6(2) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Diana Shnaider
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Chloe Paquet
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Sofia Kenin
48%
(
47 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
17
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
5
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
36%
(
18 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Jessie Aney Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
Player
Jessie Aney
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
0
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jessie Aney
Player
Aneta Laboutkova
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jessie Aney
Player
Barbora Michalkova
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
78%
(
35 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katerina Mandelikova
Player
Jessie Aney
69%
(
77 of
112)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
54 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
49 of
92)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aravane Rezai
Player
Jessie Aney
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
101)
93
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Jessie Aney
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
49%
(
36 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jessie Aney
Player
Maria Vittoria Viviani
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amina Anshba
Player
Jessie Aney
76%
(
80 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
50%
(
40 of
80)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
Break Points Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
53 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
53 of
90)
105
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaeda Daniel
Player
Jessie Aney
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
102)
-
Aces
-
11
Double Faults
7
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
31%
(
10 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
97
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(3) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jessie Aney
Player
Berta Bonardi
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
28%
(
8 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
48 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Paquet Vs Aney Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Paquet are available here and Aney photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
